Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Profile assignment: Inara Verzemnieks

One of Inara Verzemnieks’ favorite bumper stickers reads, “Visualize Tacoma.”

The sticker was born out of the early-nineties: an era when Tacoma, Washington – Inara’s hometown – had begun to reinvent itself from industrial wasteland to underground arts hub. The sticker embodied a hopeful transition, the ability to imagine what the town could be before “visualizing” it into reality. But the sticker also represents something else: two pieces of Inara that define both her, and her job as a professional writer.

Firstly, there is an aspect of taking pride in where you come from. Born and raised in the northwest, Inara loyally claims Tacoma as her home, as well as admits her annoyance when fellow Tacoma-natives – instead of taking the time to describe their smelly, yet beautiful town – default to strangers that they simply live “close-to-Seattle.” “You are so defined by the place you grew up,” she says, “and I love that I’m from Tacoma.”

The second piece lies deeper. Embedded within “Visualize Tacoma” is a larger message, noting the possibility that comes with change, and the value in being present for the stories unfolding around us. Inara’s magnetism to the writing profession is rooted in this beautiful uncertainty of life, and the work we all go through to make sense of it.

Around the same time as Tacoma’s rebirth (and, hence, the birth of the sticker), Inara was about to graduate from Stadium High School, across Commencement Bay from her neighborhood on Browns Point. As a senior, she had already fashioned herself into quite a writer – beginning with her neighborhood newsletter, but soon to include both underground journals and her high school paper. By the time she graduated in ’92, Inara knew she had found her calling.

Now a full-fledged writer, Inara’s connection to the evolving world of creative non-fiction draws inspiration from the idea of discovery: “I was never interested in breaking news, or political or process stories. I was interested in deeply inhabiting people’s lives, in writing stories that are ‘undecided,’ where you can take the reader along with you and they don’t know what’s going to happen. When you read a breaking news story, there’s not a whole lot of discovery. I like thinking of stories as a vehicle for discovery.”

Finding “the time and space” to write them, however, took Inara on a bit of a journey. She started out at the Oregonian, where she found a home as a reporter and writer for the Features department. Thirteen years later, Inara discovered that the position, while essential to her growth as a writer, could no longer satisfy the direction she intended to go: “Working at the paper was critical to me, it was critical to help me find my own voice. At the same time, I chose it, in part, for practical reasons: a consistent paycheck and benefits. After awhile, I didn’t like these practical reasons because they locked me in. They made me compromise a lot for other reasons.” For Inara, the real challenge then became finding the answer to this question: “how do you construct a life that allows you to [do what you love]?”

Today, Inara is trying to do just that. After being accepted into the University of Iowa’s prestigious MFA program, she is currently pursuing a two-year fellowship that, for lack of a better word, rules: “It’s a gift. I am paid to be there, to write, and there is no obligation. Just write, take classes, and interact with other writers.” Along with the other ten fellows, Inara attends workshops and classes like “The History of the Essay,” which as proven to be more work than she anticipated. “It makes sense… they’re just trying to flood your brain with everything,” she admits, “but I just left a job with a lot of structure. A part of me wasn’t ready to jump back into more of that.” Only a month into the program, however, she recognizes that she is still very much in an adjustment period and eagerly looks forward to the rest of the fellowship.

Her projects, while consisting mostly of class assignments, have recently begun to take a more individualized shape. Before arriving in Iowa City, Inara had five to ten things on her plate, but now realizes that gaining “traction” with just a few is a worthy goal. “I have started adapting the assignments to accommodate my own projects,” she says, in the hopes of using the fellowship experience to retain some of the momentum she feels with certain stories.

One such story links back to Inara’s own roots. As a first-generation Latvian-American, Inara grew up listening to her family’s stories. Raised primarily by her grandparents, Inara became especially aware of the story of her grandmother’s sister, who fled to Siberia to escape Latvia’s War of Independence. Incredibly, her great-aunt survived the journey, and Inara recently traveled to Latvia in an attempt to reconnect with this part of her past. While she never imagined “writing a memoir” during her fellowship, Inara also admits that, “Siberia is on my mind:” “I find myself feeling this ‘journalist hesitancy’ to write about myself. There’s some resistance there, but I feel like something important is happening and I don’t want to let that go.”

As she delves into a new phase of her writing career, Inara has followed her instincts to a place where the writing she loves can be honed and nurtured. At the same time, she does not pretend like any of it has been easy. In fact, she entrusts me with the best advice she can think of for a college writer eager to find a home in the industry: “If you believe in telling stories, you must make your choices to protect that. Don’t compromise. Defend your passion, and build your life so you can do it.” Although she ultimately decided that the paper was not for her, she admits that “money is an issue” and that “there are no easy answers to this, to writing well while wanting the security of a solid paycheck. It’s not easy, but,” she encourages, “you have to hold tight to that love.”

Before we hang up, I tell Inara what my favorite bumper sticker is – given that I consider myself somewhat of a Tacoma-native these days. “It says ‘Admit it, Tacoma. You’re Beautiful,'” I tell her, and she laughs. I guess it proves another piece of Inara’s advice: that “you have to write to know what you want to say.”

"Profile Article of Delancey Street’s Director, Dr. Mimi Silbert"

Another look at different ways to tell a story, author Halle Stockton deserved to win a first-place journalism award with this piece. Her look into the life of Mimi Silbert and her work at Delancey Street -- a non-profit dedicated to empowering the lives of former criminals and drug addicts -- was powerful, and also inspiring. If I had to critique her work, I would say that she relies a little too much on the emotions of her audience, sometimes bordering on sounding "cheesy." I think this might have been avoided if the author could have provided some direct quotes from the subject herself, instead of simply getting the views of those around her. This might have made the article feel a little more personal, rather than simply conveying repeated praise for the subject.

I definitely felt like I'd like to learn more about both Silbert and Delancey Street after reading the article, which I think is a big success for Stockton. She exposed pieces of this woman, and her story, that invite the audience to probe deeper, especially since much of the article sounds too good to be true. I'd like to visit Delancey Street and see for myself! Way to go, Mimi.

"For Hire: Fine Art Appraiser"

Cate Lineberry's article for Smithsonian.com shows one way to write a business-profile that doesn't fit Gerald Grow's model, yet still provides an an interesting, and informative look at someone's job. The article focuses on Nan Chisholm, who works for Sotheby's as a fine art appraiser, as well as appraises art on the PBS program "Antiques Roadshow." However, the article is set up more like a face-to-face dialogue, with questions explicitly stated on the page, and the interviewee's direct responses sitting below.

In a way, I think this style of "profile" is effective because it feels more casual, and you can skip around depending on what questions intrigue you most. On the other hand, it feels less like a complete, thematically arranged "story" and more like a dictation. I, personally, would prefer more of the story-type arrangement because I think it requires a little more insight and work on the part of the author. It doesn't take much to put together a question-and-answer piece following an interview. On the other hand, if you like an easier read, this is probably the right form for you.

"A Formula for Writing the Business Profile Article"

Moving away from the interview process and into the writing process, this provides a more in-depth structure for putting together a business-profile. I am always hesitant when I read things like this because I don't like to feel like describing people, especially, should take such take on such an arbitrary segmentation. I tend to lose a lot of my writing style when I try to adopt these rubrics, although I do admit they have some useful tips.

For example, I agree with the author -- Gerald Grow -- that beginning the article focusing on the person is important. This ties in with providing interesting lead-ins in general, since people are almost always more interested in the people within the business than the business itself. I also liked the suggestion of including both the "subject in business environment" and "subject in home environment" topics, but I still find it difficult to make this sound natural and not formulaic.

I appreciate the rubric, but I think it's important to write what sounds good, and to write what sounds good to you. As long as you can creatively and accurately portray the person and what they do, I think you've done your job.

"How to Conduct an Interview"

This is a basic how-to guide containing tips on how to conduct a successful interview. I like the emphasis on the "story" aspect, and how finding and collecting someone's "story" is better than simply writing down the "breaking news." It's actually very similar to an idea that came up during my own interview this past week: the ability for well-crafted creative non-fiction to lead to some kind of "discovery" among its readers that breaking news fails to do. With creative non-fiction, the reader has less of a clear idea what is in store for them, apart from perhaps the title of the article, and embarks on something new when they sit down and read it. I like the idea of applying this to interviews, and to writing in general.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

"Is Google Making Us Stupid?"

The thing I thought about most after reading "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" was the idea of how the medium through which you choose to communicate ultimately effects how and what you communicate. The anecdote about Nietzsche and his typewriter is a perfect example... and how funny that he, like so many people today, bought and started using the typewriter because of its convenience, only to have it take over his writing so noticeably that even his friends could tell.

It makes me wonder if there will ever be anything better, no matter how "advanced" we become, than a pencil and paper. The fact that it takes a long time to write anything of length, that you have time to consider your words carefully, to think through your message long and hard as you write it out... this, I think, is as fundamental to the process of writing as anything else. It IS writing.

So, maybe we should thank Google... not for its search engine superpowers or lightning fast web results, but simply for existing as the polar opposite to the considered, written word.

Now, we know. Google isn't making us stupid, it's offering a window into a virtual world where true writing disappears. It's pushing us -- in a way -- back the way we came.